|
Comments, Love Letters, and Death Threats
Comment Archive 24
The posts below were made from Jan. 5, 2006 to Mar. 4, 2006.
You can also visit our previous comment archive.
To make a post, please visit the main comment page.
Name: Eric Tull
Subject: Beer
Have you tried the new Budweiser Select?
Editor's Note: Yeah, I admit that I fell for the ad campaign and gave it a shot. It took them 25 brewmasters from 18 continents to produce a Heineken knockoff. It's probably not a coincidence that Heineken is one of the few beers other than Bud that I have difficulty consuming. (JR)
March 4, 2006 at 13:19:30
Name: Noah
Subject: 10 peace loving quotes fromm koran
Dude to be fair on the poor sand rats, the word of muhamud
(peace be upon him)(even if he doesn't wish it on anyone else) is very
very long. In a text that long their are certain to be all kinds of
psychotic sounding passages.
In several passages in the fountainhead by lady Rand Roarks work is
described in militaristic terms. In atlas shrugged [spoiler removed - JR]
Editor's Note: Defending those quotes by attributing them to "length" sounds pretty psychotic to me. Remind me to check the "Z" volume of the Encyclopedia Brittanica and see if you're right. The Fountainhead comment is vague and meaningless enough not to warrant a reply. (JR)
February 24, 2006 at 21:47:27
Name: usman
E-mail: usmanzzai@hotmail.com
Subject: destroy u devils
denmark we will destroy u this is surity and all american
dogs and bitches u r the sons of pork dogs and snakes
Editor's Note: Mmm... pork dogs. (JR)
February 24, 2006 at 01:00:48
Name: Ka'ua noe
Subject: sex and statistics
you are brillant and funny and way too real. I almost spit
out my Venti Chai Latte on my powerbook screen.....
would you like to fuck?
Editor's Note: I sense some irony. (JR)
February 21, 2006 at 20:22:24
Name: Ian
E-mail: ihall@stetson.edu
Subject: Hebraic Violence
About the top 10 peace loving quotes from the Koran... you
could just as easily find 10 "peace loving" quotes from the Old Testament
that would make those quotes look tame. Or even the New Testament -
take a look at Revelations. Yes, these verses from the Koran can be used
to justify violence against non-Muslims... but the Bible is equally full
of such pronouncements. How about, in the interest of fairness, you
grab 10 quotes from the Old Testament/ Torah too?
Editor's Note: Clearly, you're right that I could find quotes from the Bible that advocate violence, such as this doozy from Leviticus that permits the murder of women who get fucked by animals. I've already ridiculed the Ten Commandments and bashed the Catholic Church. The next time Christians or Jews gather by the thousands to riot, kill, and set fire to embassies in response to a cartoon, I will take the time to find nine more quotes. (JR)
February 20, 2006 at 15:07:27
Name: davina
Subject: macdonalds thing
u lot r bare sick i aint really religious but dat jus pure
rude!!! im sicked dat ppl cud tink dis is funny nd u all really need 2
eat better if u tink mac d is beter den cristianity no wonder u lot r fat
and desusting u really need lifes well i guess dat is hard coz u fat nd
cnt get friends or a gal apart from ur cyber girl lol!!! x
Editor's Note: U fkd. (JR)
February 19, 2006 at 14:14:10
Name: Hisham El-Shaffey
E-mail: helshaf1@email.GeorgiaSouthern.edu
Subject: 18 Moderately Fun Things to Do for Moderate Muslims
While the whole thing was rather racist it was still pretty
funny. I'm just writing to point out a few problems with the list. The
fifth Moderately Fun Things to Do for Moderate Muslims doesn't really
make much sense, as Jesus is considered a prophet of Islam. So any
disrespect towards him would also be a lack of respect for Islam. The sixth
MFTTDFMM is also flawed as Islam doesn't preach violence towards
non-Muslims. Oh and by the way a fatwa is (ussaly) a legal pronouncement to
settle a question of Islamic law, not a call to violence as the joke
implies.
Editor's Note: "Islam doesn't preach violence towards non-Muslims." Congratulations, you motivated me to gather some quotes from the Koran to show how wrong you are. I recommend that you read the book before you defend it. (JR)
February 18, 2006 at 09:22:31
Name: Unidentified
Subject: Chinese television
E-mail: quanteniacma@hotmail.com
I really agree with this list of things you can't say on
Chinese television. Those communists are so xxxxing annoying. I'm from
Taiwan, where the real "democratic, republic" chinese are. Also, you
can't mention:
1)freedom
2)protest
3)The fact that Mao-Zher-Dong has a serious mental disability
4)Ability to stick your head out the window without having the red
guard sticking coming and sticking things up your butt.
Editor's Note: Evidently, the 80s show Growing Pains was one thing the communists did allow on television. I caught the cast of the show on Larry King recently, and they said their show was extremely popular in China, due to the fact that it was one of two American shows allowed on the air at the time. The kid who played the younger brother said he's recently been working in China to start up his own Chinese version of Yan Can Cook, with himself as the star. He's trying to profit on his popularity which resulted from China's censorship of all the other TV shows. I guess not everyone is hurt by censorship. It's a little like Google profiting in China without necessarily gaining ad revenue from search phrases like "Chinese political reform". (JR)
February 18, 2006 at 09:22:31
Name: RC
Subject: response
I'm not sure what you beleive, but obviously you don't
believe the bible. That is your choice, God gives us the choice to choose to
believe or reject his truth. But one day you will have to stand before
the King of Kings and Lord of Lords and explain your position and on
that day you will finally realize that the Lord Jesus truly loved you and
loves you, but it will be too late. I pray that you just spend some
time and read the scriptures with an open mind and you can discover that
Love many of us know. I'm sorry you don't believe, please give Christ
a chance....you will never be sorry for choosing to invite Jesus Christ
into your heart....your choice.....the option is much worse than you
realize, Hell. He does not want you to go there, but you get to
choose....please take this decision seriously! I don't know you, but I Love
you!
Editor's Note: God's "choice" consists of: believe what your mind honestly leads you to believe is true and be damned for eternity, or stifle your mind in an act of faith and be saved. What is God, a fucking Nazi? (JR)
February 14, 2006 at 23:51:32
Name: Craig, 20
Subject: Grrowl -
E-mail: silver_runes@hotmail.com
Website: www.myspace.com/_pretty_boy
OMG... you really REALLY annoy me... your views are so so
wierd, and stupid. It's just so typical of an American such as yourself...
at least people in London are open-minded, or too busy to actually care
what everyone else is doing. You forget that as equal as gay people
want to be, they can't, as straight people are the maajority. Gay people
will always be a minority, which is fine, but it means, as in any
minority, it needs structure and support. |Therefore, you saying that Gay
Pride is a load of crap, isn't cool. It's something that brings a lot of
people together both gay and straight. If you go to Brighton in England,
you would see that. People actually like Gay Pride here, and its
supported fully. It just frustrates me, people like you, who share your
opinions. You have no need for 'Straight Pride' as heterosexuality is
considered 'the norm'. As for your comments (ever so generalised) on gay guys
acting up their flamboyance. Isn't it the same to say that straight
guys (sterotypically) act up to being macho? There shouldn't be a fakeness
to anyone. All sterotypes stem from some truth otherwise they wouldn't
have existed. Grrr you annoy me so much!
Hmmm... if you are supposed to REALLY be so intelligent, then i wonder
why you think the way you do. It's just not cool, but instead really
sad.
Just want to leave you with one thing...in Holland, the land of the
free, where gay people have complete equal rights as straight people, and
weed is legal, there is not a single pejorative word for gay in Dutch.
Maybe we could all learn something from that, not just tolerance for
minorities, but acceptance.
Editor's Note: You're one confused guy. All I'm saying is that any expression of "gay pride" is an admission of a lack of real pride (and of hypersensitivity towards anti-gay beliefs). I'd say something similar about someone who claimed to possess "white pride". As Shakespeare might have put it, "The drag queen doth boast too much."
February 15, 2006 at 23:51:24
Name: jon
Subject: objectivist sex
I'm an Objectivist, and I thought the "25 inappropriate
things an Objectivist can say during sex" was hilarious. What does that say
about how secure HBL is in his own views that he can't laugh at
something as innocuous as that?
Editor's Note: I was going to disagree with you and say that someone can be secure in his views and still be touchy. But after thinking about it, I guess you're right. (JR)
February 14, 2006 at 23:51:32
Name: ferno
Subject: awful
Terrible point of view.....so one sided
Editor's Note: Of course my point of view is one-sided. That's why they're called "points of view" and not "lines of view" or "planes of view". In fact, "one-sided" is a misnomer. A whole side is way too open minded for one point of view. I make every attempt to minimize my use of Euclidean geometry in my writing, and goddammit, I will try not to do it again. (JR)
February 13, 2006 at 21:18:22
Name: run_ragged
Subject: Offended
These cartoons are tasteless, hateful, offensive and
sophomoric.
Do you have any more?
Editor's Note: Those cartoons took a long time to do and I didn't even need to draw them. Also, filling this site with rewritten cartoons may be pushing the limits of fair use. Nevertheless, maybe I'll do some more anyway, just in honor of all those rioting Islamofascists, I mean moderate Muslims. I can always wait to get my first cease and desist letter for my signal to stop. (JR)
February 13, 2006 at 21:18:22
Name: Ann Murphy
Subject: peeping toms
E-mail: ann.murphy40@ntlworld.com
Website: www.faerieguardian.com
Actually, gossips are not generally women. I have an
associate who was a peeping tom and an horrendous gossip. It goes hand-in-hand.
He also has a porn addiction and his father was a paedophile who was
also a gossip. How else can you make yourself out to be the good one and
keep tabs on what everyone else might know about you? Being a gossip
can be part of the abusers M.O.
Aren't newspaper reporters gossips too? How many men do it?
Editor's Note: With that website of yours, you make it difficult to avoid an ad hominem response. ("Past life regression is a hypnotic technique for getting in touch with previous lifetimes. It can help to heal phobias, relationship issues, weight problems and many other challenges.") Nevertheless, somehow you seem reasonable here. You make an interesting observation about the relation of being a gossip to being a sexual psycho. Fortunately, I have no evidence to corroborate this. But you think that mostgossips are men? Just walk through any row of cubicles in any office building in the United States. I would have thought that even feminists would find my comment uncontroversial. Maybe there are more male gossips in other countries. Insert derogatory comment about Frenchmen here. (JR)
February 13, 2006 at 10:49:39
Name: Mason Porter
Subject: Alaska Airlines
E-mail: mason@caltech.edu
Website: masonporter.blogspot.com
I found your blog entry when searching for Alaska Airline's
psalm bullshit after having experienced it for the first time this
weekend. (I became quite uncomfortable when I saw that with my meal...)
Anyway, perhaps the best response to your entry is "Amen!". :)
Editor's Note: I know what you're saying. Unfortunately, I can't say the same thing about your blog entries on physics. I did understand the D&D stuff, though. That's the story of my life: a D&D fan without the science knowledge. Even when I played D&D (back in elementary school), it's not like I was a stickler for rules. I just took my assassin (in his black dragon armor) from village to village murdering and pillaging. I enjoyed this very much. (JR)
February 12, 2006 at 19:00:45
Name: Sivuyile
Subject: Halle Berry
E-mail: msivuyile@yahoo.com
Well Jason you certainly do have a lot to say. But maybe you
should take a look at Hollywood. Firstly the only roles black people
ever recieve are those of thugs or hookers. There are a FEW exceptions
ofcourse, but compared to white actors whho get most of the good roles i
think Halle was right in saying what she said at the Awards. Who would
you have wanted to win, maybe one of the white nominees, seeing as
though blacks only get nominated every ten years or so. So before you start
passing judgewment on things that you never experienced i suggest that
you experience them first.
Editor's Note: The only prejudice in Hollywood is against good acting and ugly people. But I'll take your advice. I'll wait until I experience winning an Academy Award as a black person before I comment on this topic again. (JR)
February 12, 2006 at 12:57:18
Name: Bob
Subject: More hate for me than you..
I would like to add: Hilary Clinton.
I feel very deeply about this. I feel deeply in general. As you will
find, my sensibilities are very delicate.
-Bob
Editor's Note: I'll reply to this, even though that piece wasn't written by me. (No one believes me that "119 People (or Groups of People) Some Guy Named Ben Really Hates" was really written by some guy named Ben.) I think if we collectively made a "people we hate" list, we've eventually have a pretty accurate census of the world's population. (JR)
February 4, 2006 at 23:01:36
Name: linden frank
Subject: your article
E-mail: lindenfrank@sbcglobal.net
SHANE ON YOU. WE MUST NEVER FORGET THE HORROR. YOU ARE
JEWISH? IF YOU ARE, THEN YOU NEED TO BE THANKFUL THAT THIS PART OF YOUR
PEOPLE'S HISTORY WAS NOT DESTROYED. THERE WERE MANY PEOPLE WHO GAVE UP THERE
LIVES AND FOUGHT THIS ATROCITY. THINK ABOUT THEM TOO.
Editor's Note: No, we shouldn't forget it. I'm just asking not to be reminded of it in five Oscar-nominated movies a year. (JR)
February 3, 2006 at 18:09:17
Name: Nikita
Subject: Complexity
E-mail: funky_nickie@yahoo.com
As usually, I applaud you, you smart bastard. You're right
about complexity. Get a load of this:
www.michaelcrichton.com/speeches/index.html
(Fear and Complexity...)
Editor's Note: And the fact that things are complex doesn't mean principles don't apply. It just means that complex stuff sometimes requires new principles. There's a difference, for example, between a human brain... and a really big monkey brain. (JR)
February 1, 2006 at 07:22:51
Name: Jesse
Subject: 48 Fun Things to Do In and Around a Department Store Fitting Room
Fucking hilarious haha, whoever made this, i love you.
Editor's Note: If you really loved me, you'd put each and every one of those things into practice. (JR)
January 30, 2006 at 23:49:13
Name: Brooks
Subject: Topic Idea
Love the site, by the way.
So I was reading that Libya pulled their embassy out of Denmark because
of the Muhammad drawing scandal, and it got me thinking. Why don't you
see this kind of outrage amongst other religions? It seems silly that
Muslims are demanding legal action because someone critiqued their
religion. I've heard some pastors in our own country get their panties in
a snit about things, but they generally seem to be able to at least
ACCEPT this concept called freedom of speech. Why can't Muslims grasp
this concept? To me, this goes beyond the inane ramblings of Christian
rightists. This is sovereign nations actually CUTTING diplomatic
relations because someone made a funny joke. You should write about it.
Editor's Note: This shit gets tedious to keep pointing out. By "this shit", I mean the actions of both Muslims and Christians. You really think Christians accept the concept of freedom of speech? Where have you been? Maybe what's confusing you is that most Christians don't take their religion seriously. And maybe that's a good thing. But maybe it's just a sign of the degree to which people are content to divorce their ideas from reality. I.e., they don't mind believing in wacky shit as long as they forget about it immediately upon exiting the Church doors every Sunday. If you can say one thing about an Islamic moderate, it's that he's willing to put his firebomb where his mouth is. (JR)
January 25, 2006 at 16:02:13
Name: Theresa Truax
Subject: "I Am Sam" review
E-mail: tltbaku@yahoo.com
May fate bring into the center of your life a "retarded"
person and may you live to understand your own human ugliness.
Editor's Note: I respect retarded people enough to say that if they weren't so retarded, they'd probably want to call you a retard. (JR)
January 25, 2006 at 16:02:13
Name: A concerned human being
Subject: This man's sexuality
E-mail: slavka@hotmail.com
The author of the current article wants to drive home the
point that he is not gay. Yet, he is talking about men's bathrooms, men's
dick, anal sex, WOW. Hey Jason, my gadar is extremely sharp. After
reading your article, it is going heywire.
Editor's Note: Why is it that when someone jokes about a distaste for, say, Brussels sprouts, no one ever accuses the person of being a closet lover of Brussels sprouts? (JR)
January 24, 2006 at 14:09:09
Name: slavka
Subject: you are fucking right
E-mail: slavka@hotmail.com
yesterday in the night i was watching the program about
"Miracle Spring Water". Peter Popoff was proposing this water for free to
everybody who wants to be rich or healthy. a lot of people who already
used this water were speaking about their happiness, million and million
dollars, expensive homes - everything that you have to do is just to
put this water on your body(or maybe drink it)- and you will be lucky
forever.
so, my opinion to this is that: Dear Mr. Popoff is just fucking the
brains of people so much hard, and like i watched all of those
people were in need or ill or just the good actors pretending that the
long-year cancer of the stomach went away immediately after using this
'miracle water'.
MAYBE WE HAVE TO TRY IT TO TOGETHER, AND PEOPLE, WE WILL BE RICH
FOREVER. (just let Mr. Popoff fuck our brains)
Editor's Note: I've heard that miracle spring water is great for wounds caused by cartoon riots.
January 23, 2006 at 21:56:09
Name: Tracey
Subject: have a question, duh!I
[entire post censored]
Editor's Note: I had to censor again. When you write about your experiences in public restrooms, my standard for an acceptable number of typos goes down below 15. (JR)
January 19, 2006 at 20:34:05
Name: ANIMALS@MSN.COM
Subject: WORDS
E-mail: aNIMALS@msn.com
stop using course words
Editor's Note: Please elaborate so I know whether you're messing with me or not. Usually, people write something like "stop using that kind of fucking language". I then have to engage in a rare act of censorship due to the crime of unfunniness. The problem with your post is that you might actually be serious, which really is funny. Unfortunately, I can't be sure. (JR)
January 19, 2006 at 17:03:08
Name: Nick
Subject: 99 red balloons
E-mail: schluglemon@yahoo.com
The 7 seconds cover of 99 Red Balloons is, in my opinion, a
whole lot better than the Goldfinger one, and you have to give them
credit, they did it way before Goldfinger.
Ps. DK's "I fought the law" isn't really a cover, the lyrics are
completely different.
Editor's Note: If the Dead Kennedys sing the words "I fought the law, and I won" to the tune of "I fought the law, and the law won", I call that a cover. (JR)
January 18, 2006 at 16:58:53
Name: Jesse
Subject: Funny, but...
I, myself, am a waiter.
The things in your list are hilarious, but if they were ever done to
me... I'd compose my list of "40 ways to stop a restaurant patron from
breathing."
keep up the lists though... very nice.
Editor's Note: Feel free to send that list to me. (JR)
January 17, 2006 at 19:31:51
Name: emily
Subject: ms. wheel chair
E-mail: jsinger1@msn.com
I found your article on the ms. wheelchair controversy
interesting. I am in a scooter due to two brain surgeries and it seems I
don't qualify because I can walk (a little, but it causes pain, so I don't
too much) I think It's ridiculous that she had to give up her title!
Neither one of us could walk across the stage, so what's the difference.
You made some good points, though, even though a bit crass for my taste.
Maybe the reason why they have separate pageants is because they don't
want those in chairs to feel self-conscience about it!
Editor's Note: I see what you're saying, but I don't think the women who participate in something called the "Ms. Wheelchair America" competition would be self-conscious no matter what they did. I would assume that decent people who need wheelchairs generally try to minimize that fact as an issue in their relationships. I.e., they probably want to be treated like human beings, not handicapped human beings. I doubt that a pseudo beauty pageant for the wheelchair-bound is something that a woman with a healthy self esteem would want to participate in. (JR)
January 17, 2006 at 00:42:10
Name: Patrick Cooper
Subject: Objectivism
As a 15 year old, I find your site incredibly amusing. In a
time and place where rationality seems to be sparse, it is a great
relief to find a site that shares my humor and my values.
It's not often that I come across something (except google) that
actually promotes reason and self-fulfillment. While I am still young and
only chipping the tip of the iceberg of Objectivism, I appreciate your
site and your intelligence. To the three R's of life, reality, rights,
and reason.
Editor's Note: Fifteen and you're already getting into Objectivism? Lucky bastard.
January 16, 2006 at 20:03:12
Name: MmSuperMario
Subject: When Stock Photography Goes Porn
E-mail: Mmsupermario@gmail.com
Freakin' funny stuff. My favorite one would have to be, She
got the grades, he got the AIDS.
You address the issues that need to be addressed!
It would be ironic though if the girl in the image was already engaging
in lots of sex. Like orgies. And I mean wild ones. Not one of those
simple ones that last like a few minutes.
-Mario
(I have reason to believe that I'm the first Mexican to visit this
site.)
Editor's Note: You make a good point. I'd love to know what these family-friendly, stock photo models do in their spare time. (JR)
January 16, 2006 at 03:50:45
Name: Jason
Subject: Another Objectivist Disappoints
E-mail: stotts_w@denison.edu
Website: www.stotts.blogspot.com
Jason, it's quite unfortunate that Harry has chosen to end
your membership with HBL. I think that your question of Mayhew's
editorship is certainly justified. Given that he has altered the original
text of the documents he was using to what he assumed (justifiably or not)
to be the "correct" Objectivist position is cause for pause when
assessing the validity of the book. Since we don't know what was changed and
to what extent, we must treat all of the text as potentially corrupt.
Knowing both Harry and Robert from meeting them in person and speaking
with each on several different occasions, I am disturbed at their hasty
treatment of your website. While I can understand that a prima facie
analysis could leave one wondering what "side" you're on (although it's
sad to think that this should matter), looking through your site and
reading into your jokes shows the real nature of your position and your
respect for the fundamental principles of Objectivism. While your site
clearly does not appeal to Harry and Robert, it does appeal to college
age students like myself - people who the ARI deems the "hope for the
future", those of us who are going to pursue PhD's in philosophy and
take the movement over when Harry and Robert retire. Sure it's not
Harry's taste, but it does suit ours. Even if your site was somehow
"corruptive", that still would not merit blacklisting you from HBL!
Objectivists believe that we all have free will and that we should choose and
think for ourselves, so why are they afraid that your site could be
corruptive? I have alot of respect for both HB and RM, but I cannot see how
these actions are anything but ad hominem abusive. You clearly had a
legitimate point and they brushed it off by saying your site was vulgar.
I'd really like to hear their side of the issue and their reasoning
behind what they've done, but given that I lack this information I am
forced to say that I do not condone what they've done and I'd ask them to
examine their motives and see what's driving them.
~Jason Stotts
Editor's Note: Thanks for your honesty. I don't think Binswanger realizes how he's blown an opportunity to be a real leader to young Objectivists. (And I mean that in the non-dogmatic sense.) As for Mayhew, I saw him lecture a few years ago on "humor in The Fountainhead", and also read a long essay or journal article he wrote on the topic. I can definitely say he's bringing a scholarly approach to Ayn Rand. If, by that, we mean taking all the life out of her. (JR)
January 9, 2006 at 00:56:19
Name: Adam Mala
Subject: Dr. Binswanger was right
I think that Dr. Binswanger's response was entirely
appropriate. It is disgraceful. Taking the end result of the some of the most
eloquent and important thinking done in the history of mankind (and
certainly in philosophy) and turning it into some lewd joke is wrong.
Your apparent ability to turn her ideas into a joke which borders on
mockery is wrong. Making light of that which is good is to make it appear
trivial. If that was not your intent, as you claimed, you were
mistaken. If it was, which I believe is likely, you are neither honest nor an
Objectivist. -Adam
Editor's Note: Your insightful analysis, your identification of my writing's nature, the thing which forms the basis of your opinion, is... (drum roll, please....): "turn". I have performed the trick of "turning" Ayn Rand's ideas into a joke. What am I, a magician? Abracadabra, I've now just turned this copy of We the Living into a rabbit. Thank you very much, folks. I haven't done anything in particular, it's just that something I've done offends you somehow, and therefore I've "turned" the thing you value into a joke. This is sloppy thinking at its best, and you're acting as if I haven't already given arguments against this nonsense. (Since you came from the above linked page, you had a chance to read them.) You're also pulling the classic, double-pronged attack of using the phrase "either you're honest and wrong, or... a dishonest, immoral asshole". That's an oldie but a goodie. (JR)
January 5, 2006 at 23:08:56
Name: Dan Edge
Subject: HBL Dissapointment
E-mail: dan_edge@hotmail.com
Website: groups.msn.com/objectivistsingles
Howdy Jason,
I hate to say I'm not suprised you got booted. HB is known for making
ethical mountains out of morally optional molehills. Part of the
reason I never joined HBL is that I always assumed I'd get kicked off for
something or other, even though I generally side with ARI on issues of
technical philosophy.
I could understand him kicking you off because your writing offended
him. That's within the realm of the morally optional, I think. But it
seemed more like he was making a moral issue of it, which I think is
silly. I thought your "25 Oist Sex" list was hilarious. Even though I've
read through it like 50 times, I found myself chuckling again when I
followed the link from HB's e-mail.
If HB booted and denied entry to every Objectivist who thought that
shit was funny, he'd have trouble finding anyone under the age of 40 who
could join his list. From the reviews I've heard, his list is tailored
to the older guard, anyway (i.e., those who don't understand why a
description of a retard smearing shit on the wall is funny).
Happy New Year, Man.
--Dan Edge
Editor's Note: Thanks, Dan. When I run my own discussion list, I'm going to kick people off for listening to dance music. Even if they joke about it, they're fucking gone. (JR)
January 5, 2006 at 14:54:22
Browse older messages in our previous reader comment archive.
To make your own post, please visit the main comment page.
|
Back to: home  10,000 frenchmen
|
|
